Reflections for teacher-student conferences1

      During the meeting of the politics and economic groups with Emma in the Mid-term time, Allyson and I still were the ones that  had difficulty finding the basic argument for our topic. 
    
    Thanks to Emma, who always takes great concern about us, ask the other groups to help us with the problem. And we finally find out our direction and also figure out our problem. In our original topic '' Can Human Flesh Search stand in justice?'' We focus too much on '' Human Flesh Search'' itself. That is, we spent too much time on emphasizing the consequences of Human Flesh Search and the behavior itself. However, this makes us hard to come up with some specific and clear ideas to distinguish our perspective. Because, focusing on human flesh search itself cannot highlight our contention. Therefore, we tries to focus more about the political and law problems, such as the freedom of speech, the efficiency of human flesh search for helping people solving problems like crimes, and the law restriction on it. By directing us to the political and law issue, I started to find my strong contention through the topic. 

    What I've learned from the other groups in politics and economic are the elegant and effectual attitude. That is, when discussing and debating the political or economical issue, we have to prove our point step by step in ordered. It is important to find more evidence to prove the contention. From Knot and Robert's group, I learned that politics is made up by various of elements that have bound with each others. Every element deeply influences each other and has much to do with the main issue. To stand well in the topic, we have to fully understand the what the laws and the evidences, give out confidence when facing the audience, and speaks in a good pace. Most important of all, our ideate must be clear and build up the points gradually.