Annotation1：Human Flesh Search Turns out Illegal and Do Harm to the Society

[Annotation 1]

    As I have mentioned in my issue paper that human flesh search is not as rightful as it seems to be. That is, it complicates the privacy and illegal problems. If a person is really considered as illegal or immoral, but does his or her family members who has nothing to do with the incident have to endure being exposed to the public? It will really bother their daily life. 

   

   According an article I found on Yuen-zi University online news called ''Is Human Flesh Search Righteous?'' When exposing one's personal information such as telephone number, address...etc. It will violate the Computer-Processed Personal Data Protection Law. Although the motivation of searching the suspects may stands in justice. However, many of the behaviors are based on moral problems. Law problem mostly have nothing to do with their actions. Forcing them to unfold their privacy to the public is to some degree more immoral.

    What's more,  by reading an article from Chi Chu magazine online, many police officers tend to use human flesh search to investigate the crime. It really helps them find the criminals and evidences easily. However, what's more concerning is that when they uses human flesh search engine to find the criminals as well as the parties and witnesses, their scars and pains suffer from the crime will be exposed to the society. Does this really means that it will solve the problem? I think it may make the incident more complicated, and the privacy of the victims will not be protected.
Therefore, human flesh search is still be regarded as an impropriate method to me. It's not mature enough through laws and moralities. 


[Sources]

http://web2.yzu.edu.tw/e_news/677/6_student01.html

http://life.sinchew.com.my/node/7731?tid=31

   

     

Can Human Flesh Search Be at the Main Dreg of Solving Problems in the Society?

[Introduction]

In May, 2013, after the conflicts between Taiwan and the Philippines has exploded. Many Taiwanese people were totally angry about what the Filipino had done to Taiwan. The incident caused hatred for the Filipinos between the Taiwanese. A woman called Miss. Dong (董小姐) updated a Facebook status which was about a Filipino migrant worker got rejected for buying boxed lunch. Miss. Dong eventually helped the Filipino to buy the boxed lunch as well as gave him an extra one.

Although the incident was unreal in the end, we cannot ignore the courtesy of Miss. Dong for telling people that we cannot shift our anger from Filipino government to the migrant workers. However, the power of net pals and the speed of passing the information have contorted the whole incident. People focus on the accuracy of the incident and blame Miss. Dong for concocting it. They don’t regard it as a simple story that wants to express some warnings to the society, but keep finding the truth that they think it was. Eventually, the net pals even used human flesh search method to force Miss. Dong come out and apologize to the whole society, which cause great pain and pressure on her. This incident also converts to the Filipino government and did great harm to the image of our government.

As we know that in the democratic society, everyone has the right to express his or her feeling or opinion. However, is it true that what majority say stand in justice? People tend to follow what the majority thinks without considering the accuracy and the fact. In this incident, we all know that Miss. Dong neglected the subject when posting the article. That is to say, she just heard the boxed lunch incident from the people passed by her; however, she transformed the incident from objectivism to subjectivism. Nevertheless, does she deserve this much blaming and critics? The good intention was twisted by the ‘’justice’’ of the net pals. Moreover, Miss. Dong harmed none in this incident. Why she shall suffered from Human Flesh Search? Being criticized and watched by the public at any moment will truly do great harm to a person’s life.

That’s why I strongly consider human flesh search can only be at the marginal side of the society, which is improper and do harm to the construction of the whole society. 

[Sources]    

http://web2.yzu.edu.tw/e_news/677/6_student01.html

 
http://tw.news.yahoo.com/blogs/society-watch/%E4%BA%BA%E8%82%89%E6%90%9C%E7%B4%A2%E5%BE%88%E6%AD%A3%E7%BE%A9%E5%97%8E-092038082.htm